downloadbrowseSubmiN|KinG's CKeygenMe #1 CuStOm

Download n00b-ckeygenme#1.zip, 5 kb (password: crackmes.de)
Browse contents of n00b-ckeygenme#1.zip

Short Info:
-----------
This keygenmes is using a custom crypto-solution I came up with while I was working on some other stuffs, and Im also using my very own Obfuscator on the target aswell - its not possible to get the tool off from anywhere, so its homemade by other words ;)

Rules:
------
-No patching...
-No self-keygenning (says itself)...

When done:
----------
Send your solution, and make yourself proud by overcoming this little tricky keygenme :=)

Difficulty: 2 - Needs a little brain (or luck)
Platform: Windows
Language: .NET

Published: 07. Oct, 2007
Downloads: 676

Rating

Votes: 5
Crackme is nothing special.

Rate this crackme:

Send a message to SubmiN|KinG »

View profile of SubmiN|KinG »

Solutions

Solution by __imp__, published 12. oct, 2007; download (4 kb), password: crackmes.de or browse.

__imp__ has rated this crackme as nothing special.

Submit your solution »

Discussion and comments

HMX0101
07. Oct 2007
Hehe, obfuscation is very poor and algo isn't so hard as you thing ;)
TiGa
07. Oct 2007
Difficulty lowered, again. ;)
It's definitively tougher than 1.
br0ken
08. Oct 2007
Leave the name and pass field blank, and the proggie is registered. Is this a bug?
__imp__
08. Oct 2007
This one is *very* easy, not more than 5 minutes to make a keygen (I have made it). imho, it's a level 1.
P.S. And yes, blank name and serial fields give the correct message. Apparently, it's a bug.
Zaphod
09. Oct 2007
If this is so easy I hope someone will post a solution soon. I have just installed the .NET frames and this is the first .NET program I have ever run.
As I understand it, .NET is something like Visual Basic - is there a .NET decompiler? And is there some special knowledge you just need to have to solve this one?
HMX0101
09. Oct 2007
@Zaphod: just use Reflector and you'll solve it fastly ;)
Zaphod
10. Oct 2007
Thanks, hmx0101 - I have just downloaded Reflector, hopefully it helps...
Jim~
11. Oct 2007
Would be better if you obfuscated the contents of the methods instead of just renaming them. Not hard to find the algo if there's only 2 methods to look in. :P
migol
03. Mar 2008
poor obstrufication, only names are changed to be unreadable

You may leave your comment, thoughts and discuss this crackme with other reversers here.
Acting childish will not be tolerated.
HTML and such will be left as-is, so don't try.